Jan Gossaert, Der Sündenfall, Inv. Nr.: 13341
Der Sündenfall
Jan Gossaert, Der Sündenfall, Inv. Nr.: 13341
Credit: ALBERTINA, Wien Image: ALBERTINA, Wien

Der Sündenfall

Jan Gossaert

um 1520-1525




Künstler:in (Mabeuge um 1478 - 1532 Middelburg)
Dateum 1520-1525
Object TypeZeichnung
Object typeDrawing
Materials / TechniquesFeder in Braun, über schwarzer Kreide oder Kohle
Dimensions25,7 x 21,0 cm
CreditALBERTINA, Wien
Object number13341
Inscribedl. "adam / den Sundt / a... / MAB [oder] JMB (ligiert)"
Markingsl.u. Herzog Albert von Sachsen-Teschen (Lugt 174)
Text

The Old Testament story of the fall of Adam and

Eve1 tells how the first pair of human beings violated

God’s only prohibition in paradise: eating the fruit

from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

The tale is paradigmatic for the timeless relevance

of issues surrounding guilt; seduction; the essence

of evil; human sexuality, self-determination, and

knowledge; and the grave punishment of such intentions.

In traditional Christian iconography, it was the

source of original sin, which necessitated Christ’s

redemption.

Jan Gossart (1478–1532) dealt with the subject of

the fall in several paintings and drawings,2 chiefly

focusing on the figures’ relationship to one another

and their physical and compositional interaction.

In his first painted version of the theme, executed

around 1510, Gossart chose a conventional solution,3

in which Adam and Eve as idealized figures stand

beside one another without touching or overlapping.

This work was largely inspired by Albrecht Dürer’s

(1471–1528) famous engraving of 1504 (fig. 1).

In Gossart’s later versions, however, the figures

interact and tightly embrace: an affective interplay

that represents a completely novel approach to the

subject in early sixteenth-century Netherlandish

art.4 In the present drawing the pair is depicted unusually,

sitting under the tree of knowledge rather

than standing.5 The nude couple leans in to kiss.

Eve holds the back of Adam’s head with her hand

while he, still somewhat reluctant, holds onto a

tree branch.6 There is no longer a seductive serpent

persuading her to act; instead, Adam and Eve both

actively clasp the plucked fruit in their hands. Their

bodies additionally frame and highlight the fruit in

the center of the drawing, while their legs, intimately

crossed, suggest their erotic (and sinful) union.7

The many depictions of nudes in Gossart’s oeuvre

attest to his knowledge of ancient Roman and

Italian art. He was able to study both in 1508–9

during a journey to Rome as part of the entourage

of Philip of Burgundy (1464–1524), an illegitimate

son of Duke Philip the Good (1396–1467). Gossart’s

drawings of ancient architecture and sculpture,

which were commissioned by Philip of Burgundy,

are the earliest surviving examples of this type by

a Netherlandish artist. They were also foundational

for his later work. Adam’s upper body, which is

leaning slightly forward and turned, mirrors the

famous Belvedere Torso (first century BC),8 which

Gossart may have seen in in Rome.9

We can trace Gossart’s effort to better balance

the figure of Adam through his correction of

the right leg, which is drawn twice. Adam’s right

hand (erroneously drawn as a second left hand)10

and the ambiguous space surrounding the tree’s

roots and trunk, upon which the couple sits, seem

incongruous. Furthermore, the loose hatching with

which the figures and the tree are modeled differs

substantially from the fine networks of lines in

Gossart’s earlier drawings. For this reason, The Fall

is assigned to around 1520–25.

Both Adam and Eve reach for the fruit with

their left hands instead of their right. Thus, it has

been repeatedly assumed that the present sheet

was a model for a woodcut, which would then be

cut by a professional form cutter.11 However, no

such woodcut is known. Scholars have considered

The Fall a potential pendant to Gossart’s Cain and

Abel.12 Yet the drawing could just as easily have fit

into a cycle on the theme of the “power of women.”13

Dürer’s graphic works, which were disseminated in

the Netherlands after his journey there in 1520–21,

may also have provided the impulse for Gossart’s

endeavors in this medium, undertaken to reach a

broader, urban public.

 

1. Genesis 3:1–6.

2. Cf. Ainsworth et al. 2010, 114–22, nos. 1–3 (paintings), 308–14,

nos. 64–66 (drawings), 314–18, nos. 67–68 (copies after Gossart).

3. Jan Gossart, Adam and Eve, c. 1510, oil on oak panel, 56.5 x

37 cm, Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza, Madrid, 1930-26;

Ainsworth et al. 2010, 114–17, no. 1. For the engraving, see

Schoch et al. 2002, 110–13, no. 39.

4. In 1953, Schwarz mentioned woodcuts by Hans Baldung Grien

(1484/85–1545) as possible models; cf. Alsteens 2010, 92;

Alsteens in Ainsworth et al. 2010, 308–10, no. 64.

5. An early example of the relatively rare type of the seated

Adam and Eve is Lucas van Leyden, The Fall of Man, c. 1505,

copper engraving, 11.8 x 8.8 cm, The Albertina Museum,

Vienna, DG1926/1896.

6. Mensger points out the typical schema of the power of

women—the dominant woman and the man who is at her

mercy—as well as Gossart’s interpretation of the fall as a

sexual act; Mensger 2017, 194–95, no. 82.

7. The motif of interlocking legs is also found in other couples

in Gossart’s works, such as Hercules and Deianira, 1517,

oil on oak panel, 36.8 x 26.8 cm, The Barber Institute of Fine

Arts, University of Birmingham, 46.10; Ainsworth et al. 2010,

221–24, no. 31; and Hermaphroditus and Salmacis, c. 1517, oil on

oak panel, 32.8 x 21.5 cm, Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen,

Rotterdam, 2451; Ainsworth et al. 2010, 224–26, no. 32.

8. Today in the collection of the Museo Pio-Clementino,

Vatican Museums, Vatican City, 1192.

9. Cf. Gossart’s Christ on the Cold Stone, c. 1530, oil on panel, 112 x

84 cm, Real Colegio del Corpus Christi, Valencia, 94; Ainsworth

et al. 2010, 210–13, no. 28 (with reference to Marcantonio

Raimondi’s [c. 1470/82–1527/34] 1508 engraving Mars, Venus,

and Eros). The Belvedere Torso was formerly in the exquisite

antiques collection of the sculptor Andrea Bregno (1418–1503).

According to Haskell and Penny 1981, 311–12, it stood from 1506

at the Palazzo Belvedere. It entered the Vatican collections

between 1530 and 1536.

10. Ainsworth in Ainsworth et al. 2010, 205, under no. 26

(Christ Bearing the Cross, private collection).

11. Cf. Ainsworth et al. 2010, 310–12, no. 65, 311–12n4, with

prior literature. For Gossart’s graphic works in general,

see Orenstein 2010.

12. Hollstein and Schuckman (HD) 1949, 8:148, no. 4. Unknown

Netherlandish artist after Jan Gossart, Cain Kills Abel, c. 1525,

woodcut, 30.5 x 22.4 cm, The Albertina Museum, Vienna, DG

1949/641; see also Ainsworth et al. 2010, 418–21, no. 117.

13. It is worth recalling Lucas van Leyden’s (1494–1533)

two great series on the power of women (c. 1514, c. 1517–19);

see Wagini 2017, 123–26, no. 31.1

 

Emily J. Peters, Laura M. Ritter (Hg.), AK Tales of the City. Drawing in the Netherlands from Bosch to Bruegel, Cleveland Museum of Art 9.10.2022 - 8.1.2023, New Haven 2022, Kat. Nr. 69

Der Sündenfall von Adam und Eva (Gen 3, 1 – 6) beschäftigte Jan Gossaert in zahlreichen Gemälden und Zeichnungen. Bei der vorliegenden Version sitzt das Paar unter dem verbotenen »Baum der Erkenntnis« und ist einander, mit der bereits gepflückten Frucht in den Händen, zum Kuss zugeneigt. Gossaert interessierten bei seiner Umsetzung des biblischen Themas vor allem die Anatomie der nackten Körper – das rechte Bein Adams war ursprünglich anders positioniert und erscheint daher verdoppelt – und die kompositionelle Verschränkung der beiden Figuren, wobei er auf Vorlagen italienischer Künstler sowie auf Holzschnitte Hans Baldung Griens zurückgriff.

Die ausdrucksvolle Zeichnung entstand um 1520 bis 1525 und ist von besonderer Bedeutung, da sie als sicher eigenhändige, reife Arbeit als Parameter für weitere Zuschreibungen an Gossaert dient. Zugleich ermöglicht uns das Blatt Einblick in die Arbeitsmethoden des Antwerpener Meisters: Die Kopie einer themengleichen Zeichnung Gossaerts in Frankfurt am Main (Städel Museum, Graphische Sammlung, Inv. 1789) stimmt mit dem vorliegenden Blatt in der Haltung der Figuren weitgehend überein, wenn diese auch um 90 Grad gedreht sind. Stijn Alsteens (in: Ainsworth 2010) schließt daher auf eine gemeinsame Vorlage. Offenbar gelangte Gossaert mittels Pausvorlagen ebenso einfach wie effizient zu verschiedenen Figurenkompositionen.


Bosch, Bruegel, Rubens, Rembrandt. Meisterwerke der Albertina, hg. von K. A. Schröder und C. Metzger, Albertina, Wien, Ostfildern 2013, Abb. 30, S. 66.

Catalogue raisonné
  • Benesch 1928, 036
  • Bibliography
  • AK Rotterdam/Brügge 1965, S. 306-307, Nr. 61
  • M. W. Ainsworth u. a., Man, Myth and Sensual Pleasures. Jan Gossaert's Renaissance. The Complete Works, London und New York 2010, Nr. 65 (S. Alsteens: »Jan Gossaert, ca. 1520–25«
  • mit älterer Literatur)
  • AK Bosch, Bruegel, Rubens, Rembrandt. Meisterwerke der Albertina, hg. von K. A. Schröder und C. Metzger, Albertina, Wien, Ostfildern 2013, Nr. 30 (Eva Michel)
  • Bass 2016, S. 86, fig. 58
  • Ariane Mensger (Hg.), Weibsbilder. Eros, Macht, Moral und Tod um 1500, AK Kunstmuseum Basel 2017/18, Berlin/München 2017, S. 194-195, Nr. 82
  • Emily J. Peters, Laura M. Ritter (Hg.), AK Tales of the city. Drawing in the Netherlands from Bosch to Bruegel, Cleveland Museum of Art 9.10.2022 - 8.1.2023, New Haven 2022, Kat. Nr. 69
  • Emily J. Peters, Laura Ritter (Hg.), AK Bruegel und seine Zeit, Albertina 15.2.2023 – 24.5.2023, Wien, München 2023, Kat. 1.
  • Provenance
  • Sammlung Herzog Albert von Sachsen-Teschen (1738–1822)
  • Online resources
    IIIF Logo IIIFPermalinkhttps://sammlungenonline.albertina.at/objects/32050/der-sundenfallImage Request
    Last edited20.04.2023